-
I could get use to this #untuck
Natitude. 2-0
-
Wil Wheaton on Teen Win Lose or Draw, 1989 (x)
Forever on the internet now.
This will undoubtedly become Wil’s equivalent of Ben Affleck’s “Daredevil”. We will never let him live it down :)
You monster.
Wooooooooooow
-
One of the most important details about stats is that on a long enough time line any stat will give you an indication of if a player is good or not. The effort put into advanced stats is to shorten the timeline. Think about pitching stats. You could wait through a players career to see how many wins they end up and how many seasons they have with 15 wins, but sports fans are an impatient lot and waiting until someone’s career is almost over isn’t a good way to know if they are really good right then.
–Fan Spring Training: Sample Sizes » We Love DC
This is a great way to think about sabermetrics in baseball. They’re here to help us predict greatness on smaller-than-whole-career sample sizes.
Nifty.
(via tbridge)
Yes.
(via tbridge)
-
Love this.
(via fishingboatproceeds)
-
-
I love that this is now a legit thing.
(via fishingboatproceeds)
-
Yes, this is happening.
I ship this in a big, bad way.
-
Jason Whitlock devastated Pulitzer entry rejected, ponders whether he sold out →
Jason Whitlock: acknowledges the rules; expresses disappointment the rules weren’t ignored for his sake; equates being rejected from consideration (for an award he’s ineligible to win) to an NFL star being suspended from play by the League on the eve of the Super Bowl; suggests there’s a racial bias against minority sportswriters 10 paragraphs before mentioning only two sportswriters ever have won the award; mentions he doesn’t object to the rules one sentence before saying, “I’m devastated and sad my dream has been stolen”; does not surprise me. Did I miss anything?
-
What's with all the empty seats? →
-
DC. From SPACE. Specifically, the ISS.
Hey! I can see my house from here!
